Question & Answer

sorciere

Date: Понедельник, 2007-07-30, 3:05 PM | Message # 91

Генералиссимус

Group: Модераторы

Posts: 1283

Reputation: 5

Status: Offline

Награды:

Quote (mishkina)

you are Super!!!

thnx

But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.

Nika

Date: Понедельник, 2007-08-13, 10:29 PM | Message # 92

Сержант

Group: Пользователи

Posts: 23

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

sorciere,
only for my neighbour
biggrin

tigroynka

Date: Воскресенье, 2007-08-19, 11:52 PM | Message # 93

Рядовой

Group: Пользователи

Posts: 1

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

hi everyone smile

need a help! wink

какой вариант будет правильным? I'll be waiting for your call. or I'll wait for your call. если ждать данного звонка я собираюсь в течении ближайших часов, а не вообще когда-либо........

sorciere

Date: Среда, 2007-08-22, 0:25 AM | Message # 94

Генералиссимус

Group: Модераторы

Posts: 1283

Reputation: 5

Status: Offline

Награды:

I'll wait for your call
Иначе нужно давать точное время: Ring me up at midnight and don't worry about waking me up. I'll be waiting for your call

But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.

pup

Date: Вторник, 2007-10-23, 3:09 AM | Message # 95

Рядовой

Group: Пользователи

Posts: 11

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

I'll be waiting for your call is the most accurate phrase to convey the meaning you want. ;)

I'm sane. At least I think I am

suomma

Date: Пятница, 2007-11-23, 9:59 PM | Message # 96

Рядовой

Group: Пользователи

Posts: 3

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

skashite pliz kogda stavitsa will a kogda present continius&

елизавета

Lady

Date: Пятница, 2007-11-23, 11:13 PM | Message # 97

Генерал-лейтенант

Group: Модераторы

Posts: 683

Reputation: 9

Status: Offline

Награды:

Quote (suomma)

skashite pliz kogda stavitsa will a kogda present continius&

suomma, одна просьба - пишите русскими буквами! Или постарайтесь сформулировать свою фразу на английском языке. Только не пишите на транслите!!!

We usually use Will when we decided to do something at the time of speaking. The speaker has not decided before.
For example:
- Let's have a party
- That's a great idea. We'll invite lots of people.

We use (be) going to when we have already decided to do something.
For example:
- Sue and I decided to have a party.
We'are going to invite lots of people.

aquamarine

mamusya

Date: Среда, 2008-01-09, 11:58 PM | Message # 98

Лейтенант

Group: Проверенные

Posts: 73

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

Hi guys, I need your helpful opinion, please. Iґve got two sentences:
She might have come in time.
She might have been reading.
Which one is incorrect and why? Iґd say both are OK, but one must be out. The second?

sorciere

Date: Четверг, 2008-01-10, 2:33 AM | Message # 99

Генералиссимус

Group: Модераторы

Posts: 1283

Reputation: 5

Status: Offline

Награды:

Quote (mamusya)

Iґd say both are OK, but one must be out.

dead sure that one is out ????:o

But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.

Post edited by sorciere - Четверг, 2008-01-10, 2:33 AM

mamusya

Date: Суббота, 2008-01-12, 3:28 AM | Message # 100

Лейтенант

Group: Проверенные

Posts: 73

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

Dead sure. It is a part of a test with only one conceivable answer. One should find the "tail" of the following sentence:
She might...
The samples I shared with U are among the "tails" on offer. Grammatically they match both. Probably semantics is meant. Then Iґd say the second version

Quote (mamusya)

She might have been reading.

begs for the continuation (e.g.adverbial cl.of time) and so is out. Your mind?

sorciere

Date: Воскресенье, 2008-01-13, 3:44 PM | Message # 101

Генералиссимус

Group: Модераторы

Posts: 1283

Reputation: 5

Status: Offline

Награды:

sounds plausible, but to my mind both ask for some details and both are correct from the grammatical viewpoint

But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.

mamusya

Date: Понедельник, 2008-01-14, 1:32 AM | Message # 102

Лейтенант

Group: Проверенные

Posts: 73

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

Appreciate and agree. Iґm still perplexed ,however- only one sentence is required. A misprint or so. No clue.

sorciere

Date: Понедельник, 2008-01-14, 6:26 PM | Message # 103

Генералиссимус

Group: Модераторы

Posts: 1283

Reputation: 5

Status: Offline

Награды:

Quote (mamusya)

Appreciate and agree. Iґm still perplexed ,however- only one sentence is required. A misprint or so. No clue.

me too. if you find out an explanation and the answer, could you share them with me? I'll be looking forward to it.

But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.

mamusya

Date: Понедельник, 2008-01-14, 10:32 PM | Message # 104

Лейтенант

Group: Проверенные

Posts: 73

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

With pleasure. If I only ever find.

AndreyD

Date: Суббота, 2008-01-26, 8:45 PM | Message # 105

Рядовой

Group: Пользователи

Posts: 1

Reputation: 0

Status: Offline

Награды:

Всем доброго времени суток! Самостоятельно изучаю английский и иногда уделяю времени правилам грамматики.
Недавно читаю про страдательный залог. Присутствует во всех формах времен, кроме Future Continuous.
А как же тогда сказать, что обЪект с какого-то момента в будующем будет подвергаться какому-то действию?