|
Question & Answer
|
|
| sorciere | Date: Понедельник, 2007-07-30, 3:05 PM | Message # 91 |
Генералиссимус
Group: Модераторы
Posts: 1283
Reputation: 5
Status: Offline
Награды:
| Quote (mishkina) you are Super!!!
thnx 
But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.
|
| |
|
|
| Nika | Date: Понедельник, 2007-08-13, 10:29 PM | Message # 92 |
|
Сержант
Group: Пользователи
Posts: 23
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| sorciere,
only for my neighbour
|
| |
|
|
| tigroynka | Date: Воскресенье, 2007-08-19, 11:52 PM | Message # 93 |
Рядовой
Group: Пользователи
Posts: 1
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| hi everyone 
need a help! 
какой вариант будет правильным? I'll be waiting for your call. or I'll wait for your call. если ждать данного звонка я собираюсь в течении ближайших часов, а не вообще когда-либо........
|
| |
|
|
| sorciere | Date: Среда, 2007-08-22, 0:25 AM | Message # 94 |
|
Генералиссимус
Group: Модераторы
Posts: 1283
Reputation: 5
Status: Offline
Награды:
| I'll wait for your call
Иначе нужно давать точное время: Ring me up at midnight and don't worry about waking me up. I'll be waiting for your call
But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.
|
| |
|
|
| pup | Date: Вторник, 2007-10-23, 3:09 AM | Message # 95 |
Рядовой
Group: Пользователи
Posts: 11
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| I'll be waiting for your call is the most accurate phrase to convey the meaning you want. ;)
I'm sane. At least I think I am
|
| |
|
|
| suomma | Date: Пятница, 2007-11-23, 9:59 PM | Message # 96 |
Рядовой
Group: Пользователи
Posts: 3
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| skashite pliz kogda stavitsa will a kogda present continius&
елизавета
|
| |
|
|
| Lady | Date: Пятница, 2007-11-23, 11:13 PM | Message # 97 |
Генерал-лейтенант
Group: Модераторы
Posts: 683
Reputation: 9
Status: Offline
Награды:
| Quote (suomma) skashite pliz kogda stavitsa will a kogda present continius&
suomma, одна просьба - пишите русскими буквами! Или постарайтесь сформулировать свою фразу на английском языке. Только не пишите на транслите!!! We usually use Will when we decided to do something at the time of speaking. The speaker has not decided before.
For example:
- Let's have a party
- That's a great idea. We'll invite lots of people. We use (be) going to when we have already decided to do something.
For example:
- Sue and I decided to have a party.
We'are going to invite lots of people.
aquamarine
|
| |
|
|
| mamusya | Date: Среда, 2008-01-09, 11:58 PM | Message # 98 |
|
Лейтенант
Group: Проверенные
Posts: 73
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| Hi guys, I need your helpful opinion, please. Iґve got two sentences:
She might have come in time.
She might have been reading.
Which one is incorrect and why? Iґd say both are OK, but one must be out. The second?
|
| |
|
|
| sorciere | Date: Четверг, 2008-01-10, 2:33 AM | Message # 99 |
|
Генералиссимус
Group: Модераторы
Posts: 1283
Reputation: 5
Status: Offline
Награды:
| Quote (mamusya) Iґd say both are OK, but one must be out.
dead sure that one is out ????:o
But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.
Post edited by sorciere - Четверг, 2008-01-10, 2:33 AM |
| |
|
|
| mamusya | Date: Суббота, 2008-01-12, 3:28 AM | Message # 100 |
|
Лейтенант
Group: Проверенные
Posts: 73
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| Dead sure. It is a part of a test with only one conceivable answer. One should find the "tail" of the following sentence:
She might...
The samples I shared with U are among the "tails" on offer. Grammatically they match both. Probably semantics is meant. Then Iґd say the second version Quote (mamusya) She might have been reading.
|
| |
|
|
| sorciere | Date: Воскресенье, 2008-01-13, 3:44 PM | Message # 101 |
|
Генералиссимус
Group: Модераторы
Posts: 1283
Reputation: 5
Status: Offline
Награды:
| sounds plausible, but to my mind both ask for some details and both are correct from the grammatical viewpoint
But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.
|
| |
|
|
| mamusya | Date: Понедельник, 2008-01-14, 1:32 AM | Message # 102 |
|
Лейтенант
Group: Проверенные
Posts: 73
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| Appreciate and agree. Iґm still perplexed ,however- only one sentence is required. A misprint or so. No clue.
|
| |
|
|
| sorciere | Date: Понедельник, 2008-01-14, 6:26 PM | Message # 103 |
|
Генералиссимус
Group: Модераторы
Posts: 1283
Reputation: 5
Status: Offline
Награды:
| Quote (mamusya) Appreciate and agree. Iґm still perplexed ,however- only one sentence is required. A misprint or so. No clue.
me too. if you find out an explanation and the answer, could you share them with me? I'll be looking forward to it.
But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.
|
| |
|
|
| mamusya | Date: Понедельник, 2008-01-14, 10:32 PM | Message # 104 |
|
Лейтенант
Group: Проверенные
Posts: 73
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| With pleasure. If I only ever find.
|
| |
|
|
| AndreyD | Date: Суббота, 2008-01-26, 8:45 PM | Message # 105 |
|
Рядовой
Group: Пользователи
Posts: 1
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Награды:
| Всем доброго времени суток! Самостоятельно изучаю английский и иногда уделяю времени правилам грамматики.
Недавно читаю про страдательный залог. Присутствует во всех формах времен, кроме Future Continuous.
А как же тогда сказать, что обЪект с какого-то момента в будующем будет подвергаться какому-то действию?
|
| |
|
|
englishcd.ru
